beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 13,627,863 as well as 5% per annum from December 5, 2013 to September 24, 2014 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. In full view of the overall purport of the pleadings in the descriptions of Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 2-2, Eul evidence 2-1, Eul evidence 2-2, Eul evidence 2-3, Eul evidence 1, 3-1, 4-1, 2-2, and Eul evidence 6, the facts that the plaintiff injured the defendant can be acknowledged as follows, and the statements of Eul evidence 3-2, Eul evidence 5 (including additional number), and Eul evidence 7 are insufficient to reverse it.
In other words, at around 23:40 on September 16, 2013, the defendant suffered bodily injury, such as a 1, 2nd west-gu, Seoul, the right side of the plaintiff, which requires treatment for about five weeks as a drinking in front of Gangseo-gu, Seoul.
(The defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million by Seoul Southern District Court Decision 2013 High Court Decision 2013 High Court Decision 200,000 won, and is currently in the appellate trial).
Therefore, the defendant is liable to compensate for damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the injury of this case.
2. Scope of liability for damages
A. Determination 1 on the Claim for Compensation for Medical Expenses) According to the evidence and the statements in Gap evidence No. 6 through No. 8 (including the virtual numbers) incurred prior to the determination on the part of the claim for medical expenses during the period of hospitalization from September 17, 2013 to November 21, 2013, the plaintiff may be found to have paid KRW 8,125,05 (= KRW 5,178,175 won (= KRW 5,175), 2,946,80) for the expenses for hospitalized treatment from September 17, 2013 to November 21, 2013 due to the instant injury, and thus, the defendant is liable to pay the plaintiff the amount of KRW 8,125,055 and delay damages.
In regard to this, the defendant asserted that there was no causal link with the assault of this case, since he merely took the face of the plaintiff, and that there was no causal link with the assault of this case. However, according to the above evidence, it is revealed that the plaintiff's salking of the salking of the plaintiff's salking was caused by external wounds, and it was not by the salking of the past, and the plaintiff was immediately exceeded the floor after he was abused by the defendant, and immediately after the assault, the plaintiff complained that he was salking, etc.