1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the judgment, is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the defendant added or added the judgment of the court of first instance, including any assertion added by the court of first instance, and thus, it shall be quoted pursuant to the main sentence of

【고쳐 쓰거나 추가하는 부분】 ▣ 5쪽 16행의 표를 아래와 같이 수정한다.

순번 사건번호 주주들 소제기일 통지일 1 서울중앙지방법원 2014가단5116366 E 등 2014. 5. 9. 2014. 5. 28. 2 서울중앙지방법원 2014가단5186846 F 등 2014. 6. 26. 2014. 7. 3. 3 서울중앙지방법원 2015가합2060 G 등 2015. 1. 19. 2015. 2. 11. 4 서울중앙지방법원 2015가소5147330 H 등 2015. 2. 3. 2015. 2. 11. 5 서울중앙지방법원 2015가단27994 I 등 2015. 2. 11. 2015. 3. 18. 6 서울중앙지방법원 2015가합511816 J 등 2015. 2. 11. 2015. 3. 11. ▣ 7쪽 [인정근거]에 “갑 제10 내지 19호증(가지번호 포함)의 각 기재”를 추가한다.

▣ 7쪽 제2의 가항 중 1)항의 마지막 부분에 아래와 같이 추가한다. 『피고는 이 사건 보험계약의 자기부담금은 1청구당 적용되는 것이므로 이 사건 각 손해배상소송마다 1억 원을 공제해야 한다고 주장한다.

In light of the purport of the argument in Gap evidence No. 3, it is recognized that the total insurance premium of the insurance contract of this case is KRW 58,400,000 per accident, the maximum amount of compensation is KRW 3 billion per accident, the total amount of compensation is KRW 5 billion, and the self-charges is KRW 100,000,000. All of the lawsuit of this case is instituted in relation to the B accounting audit as seen earlier, and the plaintiff seeks to pay defense costs incurred in the lawsuit of damages.

In view of the insurance premium, maximum amount of compensation, and amount of self-charges as above, the details of the instant damages lawsuit and the defense cost seeking payment by the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff spent in the instant damages lawsuit.