The punishment of the accused shall be determined by a year of imprisonment.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

On May 19, 2018, the Defendant, at around 07:00 on May 19, 2018, committed a danger to life, body, or property of many unspecified persons residing in a multi-household, who reside in the multi-household, by cutting off all the rubber strings of urban gas connected with the main gas, and opening a gas valve and discharging an influence gas.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written statement of D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (referring to the message, photograph, etc., and on-site photograph, sent by the person under consideration);

1. Article 172-2 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for observation of protection;

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: One year to ten years; and

2. Application of the sentencing guidelines: no sentencing guidelines are set. 3. A year (two years of suspension of execution) imprisonment with prison labor (two years of suspension of execution) brought about the life, body, and property of children as well as children who cut the rubber stuff from which urban gas is supplied at their residential places in multi-family housing and emitted gas.

The defendant's three children and accompanied suicide led to the crime of this case, or the defendant's attempt to stop the crime of this case.

Considering the fact that the Defendant’s children are exposed to the risk of gas emissions more than 10 hours, the psychological shock of the Defendant’s children, and the fact that there was a risk of causing serious damage to the lives and property of a large number of people in light of the characteristics of the Bara building where many households reside together in one building, etc., the Defendant’s liability cannot be deemed rice.

However, the defendant has three times.