Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2019. 9. 29. 02:00경 인천 남동구 B 앞길에서, ‘손님이 술에 취하여 행패를 부린다’는 112 신고를 받고 출동한 인천남동경찰서 C지구대 소속 경찰공무원인 경장 D, 순경 E로부터 제지당하며 귀가하라는 요구를 받자, “야 이 씨발놈들아. 내가 F중학교 씨름부 나왔다. 맞짱 뜨자. 싸워볼래 너 나 이길수 있어 죽여버리겠다.”라고 욕설을 하면서 오른손으로 위 경찰관 D의 왼쪽 검지 손가락을 잡아 꺾고, 위 경찰관 E의 왼쪽 팔목을 잡아당겨 근무복이 찢어지게 하는 등 폭행을 가하였다.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of the police officers with regard to the handling of the 112 reported case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and D;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant's act on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is likely to be criticized in that not only prevents police officers from maintaining the order of police officers, but also can promote light of legal order and public authority.

However, the defendant is currently recognizing and opposing his mistake.

There is no history of punishment previously imposed on the defendant.

In addition to this, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive and background of the crime, degree of exercise of force against police officers, and circumstances revealed in the trial process shall be determined as ordered by considering all the circumstances.