The defendant shall be innocent.

On April 3, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 15:20, the Defendant: (b) in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, that he operated in Kimpo-si, was aware of the Defendant’s head debt; (c) committed assault by drinking the Defendant; and (d) obstructed the Defendant’s head debt by cutting off the Defendant’s head debt; and (d) obstructed the Defendant’s head debt in response to the Defendant’s escape; and (e) took the right side glass back to several times, and (e) took the Defendant’s 14-day treatment for the following 14-day treatment.

Judgment

1. The medical certificate of injury, each victim's photograph (in the investigation record, 10 to 12 pages, 16 pages) and the statement at the police of the victim, etc., as evidence verifying that the crime of injury was committed by the Defendant's assault. However, the victim complained of the victim's assault on April 4, 2012, following the occurrence of the case. The victim complained of the victim's injury due to the victim's assault. Although there was no external opinion, the victim's intention in charge did not issue the victim's diagnosis in accordance with the victim's statement (in the investigation record, 98 pages), although the victim complained of a serious pain on the part of the victim's hair and her head, it is difficult to recognize that the victim's injury was inflicted on the victim's neck and her head, and it was hard to recognize that there was any other victim's injury as a result of the victim's assault on the part of X-RAY, or that there was no other fact.

2. First of all, whether the crime of assault was established, whether the Defendant actively exercised violence against the victim at the time and place stated in the facts charged of the instant case.