1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: Gap evidence which is not sufficient to acknowledge the plaintiff's assertion as evidence submitted in the trial of the court of first instance; and Gap evidence which is not sufficient to accept the plaintiff's assertion as evidence; and since it is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance in addition to the part which is used or added as mentioned in the following Paragraph 2, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of

2. Part of the decision of the court of first instance which is written or added shall be subject to subparagraph 1-C of the second part; and

subsection (1) of this section shall be as follows:

“. The Plaintiff and the Defendant were living separately from August 3, 2015. The Plaintiff and the Defendant applied for divorce conciliation against the Defendant, but the Plaintiff filed a counterclaim against the Plaintiff claiming divorce and solatium due to the failure of conciliation, and the Defendant filed a divorce, division of property, and solatium against the Plaintiff (the Jeonju District Court 2016ddan7183 (principal lawsuit), 2017ddan1250 (Counterclaim)). On February 23, 2018, the above court rendered a judgment that “the Plaintiff and the Defendant divorced, and all of the above claims for division of property are dismissed,” and determined that the instant real estate should be reverted to the Defendant, the title holder, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on March 13, 2018.” On March 3, 2018, “Evidence 4-1 and 2-2” in subparagraph 3 of Article 3 of the judgment of the first instance court.

The following details shall be added between the fourth decision of the first instance and the first decision:

Even if a title trust agreement was made between the Plaintiff and the Defendant regarding the instant real estate, if the Plaintiff, as a party to the sales contract, purchased the instant real estate from C and decided to be the Defendant, the title trust relationship with respect to the instant real estate was concluded with the trustor while the trustor entered into a title trust agreement with the trustee, and the truster entered into a sales contract with the seller as a party to the sales contract, but the registration was made from the seller.