Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Criminal facts

Some of the facts charged were corrected.

On March 30, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for a special injury at the Changwon District Court, which became final and conclusive on April 7, 2017.

1. On August 30, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (non-license) driven D M&A at a section of about 2 km in front of the C&W, which was located in the C&W, Seo-gu, Busan, Seo-dong, Seo-gu, Busan, without a driver’s license, from August 30, 2015.

2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act: (a) the Defendant driving of a D MT car in the temporary border specified in paragraph (1) and driving a side-road without the vehicle front of the C Scki in Fri-gu, Busan at a speed of about 10km/h, following the vehicle running ahead of the vehicle running ahead of the Fri-gu, Fri-gu, Busan to the intersection of gold.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to secure the necessary distance to avoid a collision with the motor vehicle ahead of it, and to prevent accidents by safely driving the motor vehicle ahead of it.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went through without securing the safety distance with the vehicle in front, thereby being negligent in driving the F taxi for F business in the victim E (58). The Defendant got a driver behind the taxi in front of the Defendant driving vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from a satch infection in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence, and at the same time damaged the victim’s driving vehicle to be repaired by the market value.

3. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation shall operate any motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance except for the motor vehicles prescribed by the Presidential Decree;

Nevertheless, the Defendant owned the DM car and operated the said car that was not covered by mandatory insurance as described in paragraph 1.

4. Taking over an automobile registered in violation of the Automobile Management Act;