logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.08.28 2014나26202
양수금
Text

1. The plaintiffs' primary claims added in the trial are all dismissed.

2. The following shall be paid among the judgment of the court of first instance.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On May 27, 2009, D brought a lawsuit against the Defendant seeking divorce, division of property, etc. under the Seoul Family Court Decision 2009Dhap4725 against the Defendant. Accordingly, on August 13, 2009, the Defendant filed a counterclaim against D seeking divorce, consolation money, etc. under the Seoul Family Court Decision 2009Dhap8222 (hereinafter “instant divorce lawsuit”).

(2) On June 1, 2011, the Seoul Family Court rendered a judgment ordering D to pay the amount calculated by the rate of 5% per annum from July 11, 2009 to June 1, 2011, and 20% per annum from the following day to the day of complete payment. The defendant shall pay D to D the amount calculated by the rate of 565 million won per annum from the day following the day of final judgment to the day of full payment. The defendant may order D to pay consolation money in the future from April 21, 201 to the child support of the principal of the case, and the amount of 5 million won per annum from the day of final judgment to the day of full payment. The defendant may order D to pay consolation money in the last day of each month from April 21, 201 to the day of full payment.

3) On November 8, 2012, the Seoul High Court rendered a judgment of the first instance court ordering D to pay the amount calculated at the rate of 5% per annum from the day following the day when the judgment of the first instance became final and conclusive to the day when D is fully repaid and the Defendant’s remaining appeal and the Defendant’s appeal are all dismissed (hereinafter “the judgment of the first instance court”), which states that D’s claim against D against the Defendant, which ordered D to pay in the instant judgment (including the first instance judgment), shall be referred to as “the instant judgment”, and the claim against D’s Defendant, which was ordered to pay in the instant judgment (including the first instance judgment), shall be referred to as “the instant judgment”).

4) D) D.

arrow