A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 On May 9, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of four-month imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, etc. at the wooden Branch of the Gwangju District Court, on March 2, 2010, by a fine of three million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the 31st General Military Court of the Army on March 2, 2010, and on January 24, 2013, by a sentence of two years for a suspended sentence of six-month for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the wooden Branch of the Gwangju District Court on February 1, 2013, which became final and conclusive on February 1, 2013, and is in violation of Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act at least twice.

【Criminal Facts of Crimes】 On July 16, 2014, the Defendant driven a C Ecoo motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.134% at a distance of about 100 meters from the 100m to the intersection of the aid movement distance front of the Babi Sea Bai, which is located at the lower end of Sinpo City, Mapo City, Mapo-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial report of an employee;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry reports (A), investigation reports (related to the records of driving under the influence of a suspect), and application of each statute of the judgment;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (Consideration of Imprisonment, Consideration of the occurrence of criminal records and traffic accidents, etc.);

1. The sentence shall be imposed in consideration of the following facts: (a) the Defendant’s reason for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (i.e., the fact that the Defendant’s age, career, family relation, etc. was committed again during the period of suspension of execution, as stated in the criminal records as stated in the judgment on the grounds of sentencing, including the fact that the amount of blood alcohol content did not lower; and (b) the occurrence of traffic accidents even without the volume