The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant sells alcoholic beverages with the knowledge that F and G were adults.

B. The lower court’s sentence of an unreasonable sentencing (700,000 won) on the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In light of the contents and purport of the Juvenile Protection Act and the Enforcement Decree thereof, a person who sells alcoholic beverages, etc. is subject to a very strict responsibility not to sell alcoholic beverages to juveniles for the protection of juveniles.

As such, the other party has a duty of care to demand the other party to present his/her resident registration certificate or other identification card with public probative value and to verify his/her age, unless it appears that the other party is an adult on the external basis.

In addition, if the other party neglected to perform such duty of care and sold alcoholic beverages, etc. to him/her without confirming the fact that he/she is a juvenile, the negligence of the crime of violation of the Juvenile Protection Act due to the violation of the above legal provisions shall be recognized.

(2) In light of the above legal principles, “F (M) and G (N) at the time of the instant case’s instant case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’

In full view of the fact that there is no reasonable ground to believe that F and G are not juveniles, the Defendant is a juvenile with dolusence F and G.