logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 2015.07.23 2015노191
공직선거법위반
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (in fact-finding and misunderstanding of legal principles) determined that the illegality of the lower court was not dismissed, since the Defendant stated the fact that “G candidates have distorted the fact that they had worked in the National Security Planning Agency in the past” for the right to know and the public interest of the right of the right holder in DNA.

In addition, the Defendant merely conducted an insulting evaluation of G candidates on the back of the news report materials, such as “scarcity.” and did not slander G candidates by pointing out facts. As such, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged even though the Defendant did not constitute a crime of campaigning candidates under the Public Official Election Act.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below is erroneous by misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles.

2. The summary of the facts charged 1 is that the Defendant is a person who works as the president of the E Heat History Promotion Association, an organization that commemorates the Eratical Eratty in front of the D Station around 1986, demanding the withdrawal of the C regime, amnesty of the democratic personnel, and the amendment of the direct election system.

On May 28, 2014, the Defendant was urged to withdraw from the main offender C, democratic personnel, amnesty and release, and to amend the presidential direct election system at the Roster on June 6, 1986, which was omitted, for the purpose of preventing G, a candidate for the 6th nationwide local election D local election from being elected at the Roster Office operated by the Defendant in F at around 11:18, the Defendant, at around 6th, 1986.

However, the candidate who was involved in the Eratian case at the time of the 2014 D Market election, among the candidates who were held in the D Market election, is not able to be satisfed, and such a statement of name is not presented.

".............. omitted dives the interview of the parents and democratic citizens in the identity and unclaimed personnel and the staff of the D police station thoroughly obstructed the interview of parents and democratic citizens. 30 years from the National Assembly.

arrow