logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.05.24 2017고단2922
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 25, 2014, the Defendant requires the victim E to pay a fine by drinking alcohol at the D office located in the Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si.

A false statement was made to the effect that “The interest and principal of the loan will be paid in full if the loan was made with money to receive the loan.”

However, the Defendant’s fine for drinking was determined on May 2, 2014, and was not in need of money for the payment of fine, and most of the borrowed money was intended to use it for the Internet gambling such as entertainment expenses or sports discussions. The Defendant’s name did not have any intent or ability to repay the loan even if it was given from the injured party due to the lack of economic circumstances to the extent that it is impossible to obtain the loan.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) deceiving the victim as above; (b) had the victim borrow KRW 15 million from the Korean Switzerland Bank; and (c) had the victim receive the loan from the victim from the victim; and (d) had the victim obtain a total of KRW 80 million from five times until December 2, 2015, as shown in Appendix I, from around December 2, 2015; and (b) had the victim obtain a loan from the victim.

2. On November 14, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would repay all existing loans that had been given a loan to the victim in the name of the victim on the face of the State of Guarantee.”

However, the Defendant tried to use most of the borrowed money for the Internet gambling such as entertainment expenses and sports discussions, and even if the Defendant was granted a loan by setting up a victim as a guarantor due to economic circumstances that make it impossible to obtain a loan under the name of the Defendant, there was no intention or ability to repay the existing loan granted under the name of the victim.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and let the victim do so from the loan to the defendant corporation.

arrow