1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. During the process of the decision on non-recognition of refugee status, Plaintiff A B C’s Plaintiff C’s personal data, and Plaintiff B’s Plaintiff C’s H-2016-05-28-21 2016-05-04 2016-05-06-29 on the date of entry into the Republic of Korea of a male H, a male H, a male H, and the tourism, Tong (B-2) short-term visit (C-3) tourism, Tong (B-6-08-07-012016-312016-31207-208 of the date of application for refugee status status recognition, the above Plaintiffs were unlikely to file an objection with the Defendant on the grounds that: (a) the 2016-2017-0201-2010-301-208-208-19-201-2017-10.

② On the date stated in the above list, the Defendant rendered a decision on refugee status refusal (hereinafter “each of the dispositions in this case”) against the Plaintiffs on the grounds that “it is difficult to believe that the Plaintiff’s statement is exaggerated, and it is difficult to deem that there is a risk of serious gambling solely on the ground that the Plaintiff is a believers of the I Religious Organization.”

③ Although the Plaintiffs filed their respective objections with the Minister of Justice, the Minister of Justice dismissed the Plaintiffs’ respective objections on the date stated in the above table.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 4, Eul evidence 3 to 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. 원고들의 주장 중국 정부는 I종교단체를 전형적인 사교(邪敎) 집단으로 분류하여 일반 신자들에 대하여도 광범위하게 박해를 가하고 있다.

The plaintiffs, as the believers of the I Religious Organizations, had been suffering from stuffed by themselves due to their religious life in China, or faced with the risk of persecution due to the overall gambling of China, and led to the occurrence of the dangers of persecution in China to enter the Republic of Korea.