(영문) 대전지방법원공주지원 2016.07.06 2015가합20502

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원공주지원 2016.07.06 2015가합20502

소유권이전등기

Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Jantant.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a clan with the members of Kmph 47 years old L as its members and worked for the Plaintiff to make the enactment rules by making the name "M clans Association" in October 9, 1980, and currently refers to "A" in this context.

B. On January 21, 201, the Plaintiff: (a) held a clan general meeting (hereinafter “201 general meeting”) on January 21, 201, and subsequently amended the bylaws to the effect that matters concerning the maintenance and management of the clan property shall be decided at the Grand General Meeting (hereinafter “the amended regulations”). (c) On January 15, 2012, the Plaintiff sought against the Defendants the implementation of the procedures for the registration of ownership transfer based on the cancellation of title trust with respect to the Defendants’ shares out of the instant real estate, but did not perform the said procedures; (b) on June 5, 2012, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendants for the implementation of the procedures for the registration of ownership transfer (hereinafter “previous”) for the termination of title trust with respect to the Defendants’ shares out of the instant real estate as the representative of the Daejeon District Court’s official branch 2012Ga385. The Plaintiff continued to hold a general meeting (hereinafter “the former General Assembly”).

E. On September 25, 2013, the court of the first instance of the previous trial held on September 25, 2013: (a) there is no evidence to acknowledge the fact that a clan member has given legitimate notice of convening a general meeting; (b) the resolution made by the general meeting is null and void; (c) the amended regulations made according to the invalid general meeting resolution are also null and void; and (d) the previous suit brought by the resolution of the representative general meeting is also illegal; (b) the practice that the Plaintiff clan holds the general meeting on October 9 of each year; or (c) the existence of the effective regulations that stipulate that the general meeting shall be held on the above day cannot be recognized; and (d) the general meeting in 2012 shall also

유사 판례

-대전지방법원공주지원 2017.06.01 2016가단20489

-대법원 2015.12.10 2014다29483

-춘천지방법원원주지원 2017.09.21 2017가합5088

-대전지방법원공주지원 2012.02.01 2010가합794

-대전지방법원공주지원 2012.02.01 2011가합944