logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 남원지원 2017.01.24 2016고정82
대응되는 죄명 없음(2010.02.27 전환)
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On July 31, 1999, the Defendant violated the restriction on the operation of vehicles by loading and operating freight of 11.05 tons of freight at the fourth axis of the freight 11.05 tons in relation to the Defendant’s work at the 17th line located in the national highway of Kucheon-si, in the document of 20:22 on July 31, 199.

2. On the facts charged in this case, the public prosecutor charged a public prosecution by applying Articles 86 and 83 (1) 2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995 and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005) to the facts charged in this case.

In this regard, the Constitutional Court shall, when an agent, employee or other worker of a juristic person commits an offense under Article 83 (1) 2 with respect to the business of the juristic person, be punished by a fine under Article 86 of the above Act.

“The Constitutional Court Decision 2010Hun-Ga38, October 28, 2010, rendered a decision that the part is in violation of the Constitution (the Constitutional Court Decision 2010Hun-Ga, October 28, 201).

Accordingly, the above provision of the law was retroactively invalidated in accordance with Article 47 (3) of the Constitutional Court Act.

3. Inasmuch as the instant facts charged constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, a judgment of not guilty is rendered pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow