logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구고등법원 2020.01.23 2019나21423
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing the instant case is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing the instant case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance excluding adding some contents as set forth below. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance

The following contents are added to the 10th 16th 16th 16th 16th 2nd 200.

Even according to the testimony of the witness of the first instance trial, “The defendant C promised to employ P as the employee of the defendant company” to P. However, the plaintiff and the defendant agreed on September 2014, after the transfer agreement of this case was reached between the plaintiff and the defendant, it was limited to transferring KRW 30 million to P. Thus, P was down and it was thought that P was belonging to C. Thus, the witness of the first instance trial consistent with the plaintiff’s argument cannot be ruled out that it is difficult to believe that the testimony of the witness of the first instance trial would be unfavorable to the defendant, and that it would be difficult to recognize that it was difficult for the plaintiff to testify as the result of the plaintiff’s second instance trial to believe that there was lack of evidence to acknowledge that it was difficult for the plaintiff to testify as the result of the investigation into the trust relationship between the plaintiff and the head office of the building at the time of the second instance.”

2. Conclusion.

arrow