logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.09.19 2018누66779
재정비촉진계획변경결정취소
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The grounds for admitting the judgment of the court of first instance, which the plaintiffs asserted in the trial while appealed, are not significantly different from the contents claimed by the plaintiffs in the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance which dismissed all the claims of the plaintiffs even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance and the court of first instance are

Therefore, this court's reasoning is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, this court shall accept it in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

After the third third third decision of the first instance court, “The Intervenor joining the Defendant was the developer of the instant redevelopment project after obtaining authorization from the head of Yongsan-gu in accordance with the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents on September 4, 2012 to implement the instant redevelopment project.”

4 Myeon 12's "No. 8" shall be changed to "No. 8,10, 11."

5.On the 13th page “(13),” following the phrase “(or, the Plaintiffs are asserting that the designation of the renewal acceleration zone of this case is null and void on the grounds of illegality of the disposition of this case.”

In the 8th 14th 14th above, the defendant added "in accordance with the results of the above deliberation, the 18 buildings to be retained were excluded from the renewal promotion zone of this case and the disposition of this case was designated as the Zfet area."

11. Following the 11th 8th 8th m. “The Plaintiffs have established two general planning plans under Article 9 of the Special Act on the Promotion of Urban Renewal and Article 11 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act.” As regards the principle and direction of the formulation of urban renewal acceleration plans, “diversified by means of maintenance, conservation, management, etc. that respect the spatial value and regional assets,” “O special tourist zone, AD distance, N elementary school, OPS, more residential places, existing apartment buildings, and activated commercial areas.”

arrow