The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for six months) that the court below sentenced against the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is in conflict with the defendant's mistake, and the defendant's punishment of this case becomes final and conclusive, etc. However, these circumstances appear to have been considered in the court below's entirety, and there are no changes in circumstances at the court below's trial and there are several records of punishment for the same kind of crime, etc. on the other hand, the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case without being aware of the fact that the defendant was under the period of suspension of execution; the defendant was damaged to the victim or did not reach an agreement with the victim; the defendant was under the investigation of each of the crimes of this case; the defendant was under the investigation of this case and was under the disposition of notification of payment of penalty by taking the intangible awareness of each of the crimes of this case; and the defendant was not under the investigation of this case, taking into account the motive, circumstance, age, age, character, environment, etc. of the defendant causing each of the crimes of this case, and the sentencing of the court below is too inappropriate. Thus, the above defendant's assertion is not justified.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per

However, pursuant to Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, the change of " June 23, 2013" in the last sentence of Article 25 (2) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure to " June 26, 2013" shall be corrected.

.