A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

One sheet for redemption of seized bonds and one sheet for collection of claims shall be respectively.

Punishment of the crime

In the name of the employee of the singingishing operations, the employee of the singishing operations misrepresented the victims that he should make cash payments under the pretext of the repayment of existing loans and the payment of deposit money, etc., and made the victims deliver cash to the cash collection account. The Defendant, upon receiving a proposal from the singishing operation staff, misrepresented the victims to “C proxy” and wired cash from the victims to the designated account managed by the singishing organization, wired the cash from the victims to the designated account managed by the singishing organization. In addition, the Defendant conspired to commit the singishing operation by printing out the document in the name of the financial institution forged by the singishing organization, and to receive approximately KRW 20 to 300,000 per time in return, by soliciting the victims to commit the singishing operation.

1. On November 2, 2020, in accordance with the aforementioned conspiracys with the victim B, the name-dissatisfyed person misrepresented the victim’s staff and called the victim for a false statement to the effect that “the employee sent 8 million won deposit shall be paid for the loanable computer system, so that he/she must do so in cash.”

However, there was no intention to lend money to the victim.

As above, the person who was unaware of the name was accused of the victim, and the defendant, at around 16:26 the same day, misrepresented the "C proxy" in the front way of the "F" in the following city E in the following day, and took place as if he did not receive the money required for the loan, by deceiving the victim again, and by deceiving the victim, he received eight million won in cash from the victim.

2. Pursuant to the aforementioned conspiracys with the victim G, the name-in-facter, by misrepresenting H staff around October 29, 2020, expressed that he would make a substitute loan to the victim by communicating with the victim. On November 2, 2020, he/she applied for a substitute loan to another financial right by misrepresenting the employee of I Bank around November 2, 2020.