A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Punishment of the crime

On February 12, 2008, the Defendant was issued a summary order of a fine of two million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Ulsan District Court on February 12, 2008, and on November 27, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

On March 27, 2015, at around 15:00, the Defendant driven C Star Corpex under the influence of alcohol content 0.127% from a section of approximately 2 km from the Gluri-gun, Ulsan-gun, Seoul-gun, the Glive-gun, the Glive-si, the Glive-si, the Glive-si, the Glive-si, the Glive-si, the Glive-si, the Gl

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Notification of the results of the drinking driving control, protocol on the results of the drinking driving control, and a report on the state of drinking driving and a statement;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of criminal records, inquiry reports, investigation reports (where they are attached to the previous records and written judgments, etc.);

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation is that the defendant is starting up and reflecting the crime, the date on which the defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol immediately before, on August 26, 2009, the crime of this case was committed after a considerable period of time, and the fact that the health of the defendant is not good is the factor for sentencing favorable to the defendant.

The defendant, including one time prior to the suspension of execution, repeated the same kind of crime even though he had been subject to criminal punishment four times, and the defendant committed a violation of the Road Traffic Act, etc. while being tried on the grounds of the violation of the Road Traffic Act, and did not know about again being sentenced to the suspended sentence on May 12, 2010, repeated the crime in this case without being informed of the suspended sentence on May 12, 2010, and the defendant's blood alcohol concentration level is not easy, and there is no inevitable circumstance that the blood alcohol concentration of the defendant is required to run a drunk.