beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On July 28, 2014, the deceased B (hereinafter “the deceased”) had a notary public attend a law firm’s general law office as a witness, and then prepared a testamentary document stating the title of the deceased’s real estate and deposits (hereinafter “notarial deed of this case”) to the Plaintiff on the basis of No. 193, 2014.
1. A testator shall testamentary gift to the plaintiff the following real estate and deposits:
66) Deposit Bank: The deposit account amount of the KB National Bank: The deposit amount of the deceased: The deposit amount of the KRW 1,500,000,000: the deposit amount of the deceased: the deposit amount of the KB National Bank: the deposit account number of the KB National Bank: the document number of the deposit amount of the deceased: the FB Bank account amount: the sum of the deposit amount of the deceased: the sum of KRW 422,77,221,000,000 (gold KRW 422,777,221).
B. Of the contents of the notarial deed of this case, the parts relating to this case are as follows.
C. The Deceased died on January 13, 2017.
Meanwhile, the Deceased had a deposit claim against the Defendant, but as of May 30, 2017, the details and amount of the deposit claim are as shown in the separate sheet of deposit.
(hereinafter “each of the instant deposit claims”) D.
The Plaintiff asserted that each of the instant deposit claims was bequeathed, and presented a testamentary document of this case, and claimed the above deposit claim against the Defendant.
However, the defendant requested consent from other co-inheritors and rejected the plaintiff's claim.
E. On July 28, 2017, when the instant lawsuit was pending, the Defendant is the heir of the Plaintiff or the deceased, on the ground that the heir, such as the heir G, requested that the heir would not pay each of the instant deposit claims without the consent of all other inheritors, etc., and there is a dispute as to the ownership of the said deposit claims, and whether the instant testamentary deed is genuine or not, is doubtful.