Text
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The relationship G of the parties concerned (hereinafter “the deceased”) is a deceased person who was under medical treatment in K Hospital (hereinafter “K Hospital”) due to Maternia, Maternia, Maternia, and Maternia, which occurred after the Maternia, Maternia, and Maternia (hereinafter “K Hospital”), located in H as of the time when the Defendants provided medical treatment as a member of the Medical Center, and the other plaintiffs are lineal descendants of the deceased.
B. On June 2014, the Deceased’s spathical Deceased visited the fire extinguisher inside the K Hospital and received outpatient treatment, and thereafter, was diagnosed by alcohol livering around October 2015 during tracking observation on a regular basis.
C. The deceased in the process of the treatment at the Defendant Council member was treated as a pain from around 2009 due to the pain of the brupt that occurred between the deceased and the Defendant Council member. The Defendants diagnosed the brupt pain of the deceased as a bruptal brus, and implemented sediative treatment such as the treatment of various drugs and the treatment of the brupt brus and the treatment of the brupt brus.
After June 2015, the Deceased was subject to the peltone bombing bombing from around June 2015 to July 2015, and the details received from around December 2015 are as follows.
On the 16th day (2.2.), symptoms, diagnostic medication, and treatment 16th day (15.12.2.), fluoral blue blue fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluorals, and 19th day after the 17th day after the 17th day after the fluoral coarinal fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral, the 21th day after the 21st day after the fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral f.