The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The grounds for appeal revealed by the Defendant are not only facts, but also facts, and there was no purpose of slandering the victim as a purpose of public interest to widely inform the drama director, etc. of the departure of the victim.

The contents of the Defendant’s comments cannot be seen as an insulting expression that could undermine the social evaluation of the victim.

2. According to the evidence duly examined and adopted by the court below, it is recognized that the contents of the list of crimes (1) expressed by the defendant are all false, and the purpose of slander is also acknowledged in light of the background, contents, and method of expression of the letter.

B. It would be sufficient to view the content of paragraph (2) as the expression of an abstract judgment or an satisfic sentiment that could undermine the social assessment of the victim beyond the degree of an exceptional and indecent expression.

The lower court’s judgment that convicted the Defendant of the facts charged is justifiable and does not err by mistake.

3. Conclusion, Defendant’s appeal cannot be accepted.