logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.06.26 2018고정592
특수재물손괴등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Criminal facts

In the process of taking over a building owned by the victim C from the victim C, the defendant did not have good appraisal with the victim due to monetary payment.

1. Whether the Defendant, on October 28, 2017, sent a written message to the victim “E” in front of the restaurant located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (E) around 07:52 on October 28, 2017, was designated as the Defendant.

"A dangerous object in the front of the car, which is a dangerous object in the near Dr. B. B., the car was accompanied by KRW 405,000,00 for the car by getting out of the direction of the driver's seat for the car owned by the victim, and by getting off the front glass of the car with a dangerous object.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous things and destroyed the car owned by the victim.

2. While the Defendant damaged a passenger car owned by the victim at the above date, time and place as described in the above 1.3 paragraph, G and her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her part toward the body of the victim C (22 her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officer in G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged by vehicles;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 369 and 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 260 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of penalties for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant bears the repair cost of the vehicle that has damaged the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the defendant appears to have committed the crime of this case contingently as a dispute arises in the course of purchasing the building from the injured party, and the defendant is deemed to have committed the crime of this case.

arrow