1. Of the distribution schedule prepared by the said court on July 20, 2017 with respect to the distribution procedure case of Gwangju District Court B, against the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

가. 광주광역시 남구는 C공사(2차)와 관련하여 주식회사 무등팰리스에게 공사대금 96,896,700원의 채무를 부담하고 있었다.

주식회사 무등팰리스의 채권자들인 피고들은 다음 표 기재와 같이 주식회사 무등팰리스의 광주광역시 남구에 대한 공사대금채권(이하 ‘이 사건 공사대금채권’이라고 한다)에 관하여 채권압류 등을 하였다.

On February 2, 2017, the date of delivery of the third debtor, such as the notice of the decision on provisional seizure of the claim amount of the creditor's case number, 13,498,906 won in the seizure and collection order of the claim to transfer the provisional seizure of the claim 15,000,000 won 15,000,000 from the Gwangju District Court 2017Kadan392 and the Gwangju District Court 2017Tho High Court 297 on February 2, 2017 to the original seizure and the collection order, 53,498,906 won in March 6, 2017, Defendant A Gwangju District Court 2017Tho 3570 and collection order 30,567,123 won in March 27, 2017.

원고는 2017. 5. 11. 주식회사 무등팰리스에 대한 다음 표 기재와 같이 합계 18,099,900원의 고용보험 등 4대 보험의 보험료 및 연체금(이하 ‘이 사건 보험료 등 채권’이라고 한다)을 청구금액으로 하여 이 사건 공사대금채권을 압류하였고, 같은 날 광주광역시 남구에 위 채권압류 사실에 대한 통지가 도달하였다.

C. On May 11, 2017, Nam-gu, Gwangju Metropolitan City deposited the total amount of KRW 96,896,700 for the instant claim for the construction payment on the ground of Article 248(1) of the Civil Execution Act (No. 3179 of Gwangju Metropolitan City District Court Decision 2017), and on May 24, 2017, submitted a report on the reason of deposit. The creditor column of the report on the reason of deposit stated the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s claim, but omitted the Plaintiff in the report on the reason of deposit in the attached documents.

On June 2, 2017, the Plaintiff’s employment insurance in this case as indicated below in the auction court.