1. The Defendant’s KRW 51,950,261 as well as 5% per annum from July 9, 2016 to August 31, 2017 to the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On July 8, 2016, B: (a) around 22:44, 2016, the C Bus owned by New Busan High Speed Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Ampic vehicle”) was driven from the river side of the tegrhion of the direction of the city (48 km speed at the speed of 40 km, A No. 2) toward the speed of about 48 km in the direction of the direction of the scam along the direction of the direction of the scam along the direction of the direction of the scam, along with the direction of the direction of the direction of the scam along the direction of the scam, and received the D (hereinafter “the network”) crossing the direction from the left side of the crosswalk at the time of red signal.

(hereinafter “instant traffic accident”). (b)

On August 30, 2016, the Deceased died from the instant traffic accident, such as the acute respiratory failure, etc. at the Indones University Hospital located at the Busan-gu Busan-do Welfare around 06:50 on August 30, 2016. The Plaintiff inherited the deceased’s property solely due to the denial of the deceased’s property, and the Defendant is the mutual aid business operator for the Adunes vehicle.

C. B was indicted for violating the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Act No. 2017Kadan89) with respect to the instant traffic accident, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 10,000,000 on April 26, 2017, and the said judgment became final and conclusive as it is.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Eul evidence No. 1 and images (including branch numbers where there are branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), significant facts in this court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the above recognition of liability and the above evidence, the traffic accident in this case occurred due to the negligence of driving a melting vehicle while performing the duty of pre-fescence. Thus, the defendant is liable to compensate for damages suffered by the plaintiff, who is the deceased and the deceased's family member, due to the traffic accident in this case, as a mutual aid business operator of a melting vehicle, unless there

B. Limit of liability, however, governance of crosswalks when pedestrian signals are red signalling at night to the deceased.