A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On June 28, 2017, the Defendant: (a) on the ground that the Victim F ( South, 67 years old) who was in a de facto marital relationship in the past was refused to live together with the Defendant while there are many and unspecified persons, such as E, from the alleyway located in Busan-gu Busan-gu, Busan-do around 16:30 on June 28, 2017; and (b) on the ground that the Defendant refused to live together with

20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 2

The victim openly insultingd the victim, stating that the gue gugushes, well-beingd and well-beingd.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial entry of a protocol concerning the suspect examination of the police against the defendant;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F and E;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The part dismissing a public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the order of provisional payment

1. The Defendant in this part of the facts charged is currently pending a divorce lawsuit between the victim C and the married couple who was married on July 15, 2016.

The defendant, around 14:46 on April 25, 2017, was about 4:24, Seosan City Gong3-24, and around the order of the public service center for the Seosan branch of the Daejeon District Court, which brought about a dispute between the defendant and the defendant's vehicle booms and keys of the victim.

2 years ago hered

R. M. E.L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L.C. in Daejeon prison.

“The reputation of the victim was damaged by openly alleging the fact.”

2. The determination is that it falls under Article 307(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent pursuant to Article 312(2) of the same Act. However, according to the statement of non-wons for punishment submitted to this court on March 27, 2018, which was the date of the instant indictment, it can be recognized that the victim does not want to be punished against the Defendant.