A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three months.

Criminal facts

The Defendant is a holder of CYF Lasta car in his wife B.

1. On April 24, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) operated the said YF rocketing car within the 3km section of approximately 1508-dong 1508-dong, which is located in the front of the 784 high-speed apartment located in the 784 km as the center of the members of Ansan-si, Ansan-si.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act operated the said car without having subscribed to mandatory insurance at the above temporary location.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the driver's license ledger and non- mandatory insurance policies;

1. Relevant Article of the Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Article 43 of the same Act (unlicensed Driving), Article 46 (2) 2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act, the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act, and the selection of imprisonment, respectively;

1. In light of the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act that aggravated concurrent crimes (the Defendant was punished for a traffic crime, and the Defendant was punished for a same kind of crime within the suspension period of execution due to driving under drinking, and the Defendant committed the instant crime again within the suspension period, it is inevitable to sentence the Defendant as a sentence, in view of the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime.

However, it is decided as per the disposition for the reason that the defendant is led to confession and reflect, etc., and all the sentencing conditions shown in the trial of this case are taken into consideration.