A defendant shall be punished by penal detention for twenty days.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is between C and C.

And the victim D is the father of C, E is the remaining father of D, F is the father of D, and the victim G is the father of D, and the victim's father of D.

1. On November 25, 2010, the Defendant: (a) around 17:30 on November 25, 2010, when intending to hospitalize D, as well as C, a partner of C, in front of a line hospital located in 6117, the Sung-nam Si, Ma-gu, Ma, Ma, Ma, G, and Si expenses, would be E, F, and Si expenses.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the victim D's body by setting up against the victim D's breast with the victim's chest at one time as tight hand, and driving the victim D's chest at one time as chest.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and place as above, was a trial bonus for the same reason, and the victim G was boomed with the victim G from the advanced attitude that the victim G flapsed with his flaps, thereby provokinging the victim G in the future, and booming the victim G with the chest and flaps.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and G;

1. Application of the CD-related film law

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. The Defendant, etc. asserts that, among concurrent crimes, the instant crime was self-defense to prevent the instant crime in the course of assaulting C by D, the determination of the Defendant and his defense counsel’s assertion under the former part of Article 37, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act.

According to each of the above evidence, D's article 13 and 18 of the Criminal Procedure Act, it is hard to view D' as self-defense because it is hard to recognize the fact that D's back was committed in the crime of this case, and it is hard to view D's self-defense.

Defendant

The above assertion is not accepted.

The defendant or C pointed out the fact that D's gambling was serious at the time, and his behavior was an inevitable option to correct the wrong habits of D.

However, C has enforced father D for a long time.