(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2015.11.04 2015고정272

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2015.11.04 2015고정272

명예훼손등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2015, 272] The defendant is a person who was the chairperson of the Seocho-si, Changwon-si, the Council of Residents of the Republic of Korea.

1. On June 28, 2014, the Defendant: (a) prepared the following as follows: (b) no one had used the money owned by the victim D(CBC 702) individually; (c) as if the victim used the money individually, “702” in the form A4, as if the victim used the money owned by the resident, “70,000 won or less than 20,000 won the money occupied by the resident for cleaning; (c) all taxes are currently in the state of drinking; and (d) attached the elevator and the victim’s house to the front of the entrance of the victim’s house to be seen by the resident; and (d) attached the said money to the elevator and the victim’s house in which the resident can be seen by the resident, thereby impairing the victim’s reputation by publicly pointing out false facts.

2. On July 4, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant: (a) entrusted the cleaning of Bara to the service company; (b) cleaning of Bara at an extraordinary meeting of the Emergency Countermeasure Committee to the victim D; and (c) caused the victim to conduct cleaning after receiving KRW 200,000 per month; (d) then, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s cleaning by placing the complaint in the broom warehouse, which is a cleaning instrument, broom, broom, broom, garbage bags, etc. kept in the parking lot, which brought the complaint in mind; and (c) by force preventing the victim from cleaning with the key.

[Attachment 2015, 273]

1. The Defendant of defamation, around January 6, 2014, copied and posted a copy of the request for management expenses for April 2006 by the victim E (CFC 202) on the bulletin board of the above CFC 206, and then “1. This document is a fake receipt.”

is a fake receipt which moves fake and painting into a computer;

2. Case number 208Na13535 is received following the second instance of management expenses.

Receipt forged of a private document.

The receipt that the judiciary has forged it.

I have the capacity to examine.

"At the end of February 6, 2014, a copy of the request for the management expenses."

유사 판례

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2013.05.01 2013고단571

-창원지방법원 마산지원 2015.02.04 2014고정610

-인천지방법원 2016.09.21 2016나4631

-창원지방법원 마산지원 2018.03.16 2017고정447

-인천지방법원 2020.12.03 2020고정319