1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the amount ordered to be paid below shall be cancelled.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Plaintiff A is a person who actually operates Plaintiff B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) that imports and sells health foods; Plaintiff Company is a corporation established for the purpose of importing and selling health-related foods; Defendant is a person who purchases health-related foods from Plaintiff A and sells them via the Internet, etc.

B. 1) On April 9, 2013, the Defendant: (a) at the Defendant’s office of Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E Apartment 110 Dong 401, and (b) even though the Defendant did not proceed with the Plaintiff’s lawsuit for the return of the investment amount, the Defendant connected the Internet and entered the lawsuit for the return of the investment amount in the Belgium G Import Company B (State B) president and the present case for the return of the investment amount under the title “I are in progress” (G) “I are in the process of the lawsuit for the return of the investment amount in the Belgium G Import Company B (State B) president and the U.S. F. The delivery of the investment amount after the termination of the contract is not possible; and (c) there is no yet demand for the return of the investment amount after the termination of the contract; (d) if the Defendant had access to the health food distribution company from among the health food distribution companies, the time of contact with the Plaintiff and caused any damage to the Plaintiff.” (hereinafter referred to as the “instant notice 1”).

(2) In addition, the Defendant published the Plaintiff’s photograph at the same place on April 11, 2013, and the Defendant did not file a complaint with the police against the Plaintiff A as a fraud, and even if the Defendant did not proceed with the Plaintiff’s lawsuit for the return of investment deposit with the Plaintiff, the Defendant stated the false fact as stated in the foregoing paragraph (1) (hereinafter “instant notice 2”).

(3) On May 21, 2013, the Defendant published the Plaintiff A’s photograph, and the facts are 50% of G.