A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 7, 2006, the Defendant was notified of a summary order of a fine of 500,000 won for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court, and was notified of a summary order of 1.5 million won by the same court on June 29, 201.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle of D, X-G.

On July 5, 2014, at around 01:15, the Defendant driven the above vehicle while under the influence of alcohol of 0.176% of blood alcohol concentration, and proceeded directly with the 3029 Gacheon Tri-distance front road as the galebbb in Daegu hydro-gu, Daegu.

Since there are three-distance crossings where signal lights are installed, the driver engaged in driving of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving the motor vehicle safely in accordance with the signals and the right and the right of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, has been negligent in violating the signal as it is and proceeds in the anti-fluence of Madles, and is waiting for a signal.

The part of the victim E(29 years old) driver's driving and the part of the victim G (51 years old) driver's driving in accordance with the new subparagraph with the above vehicle was driven by the victim G(51 years old) driver's driving, and the part of the front driver's driving in the passenger vehicle in front of the right part of the Defendant's driving vehicle and escaped without stopping.

At around 01:20 on the same day, the Defendant continued to run the front road of J, which is located in the Daegu Suwon-gu I, from the full-distance flood protection area to the long-distance wind protection area.

Since there is a long distance crossing where signal lights are installed, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to accurately operate the steering direction and brake system and to safely operate it by properly examining the steering direction and the left and right of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so under the influence of alcohol and proceeds from the negligence.