logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.03.26 2017고단8111
응급의료에관한법률위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who violates the Emergency Medical Service Act shall interfere with an emergency treatment or medical treatment of an emergency patient engaged in providing emergency medical services by means of violence, intimidation, deceptive scheme, threat or by other means, or destroy, damage or occupy medical facilities, equipment, medicines or other instruments for emergency medical services of a medical institution, etc.;

On November 21, 2017, at around 03:47, the Defendant was found to have been used in the “C” underground, and was transferred to the “E hospital” emergency room located in Osan-si, and completed cT shooting, and then tried to deduct the number of dypine dypine dypine dypine dypine at the bed of the above emergency room at around 08:00 on the same day, the Defendant dypined from the nurse F, and dypined the above nurse’s face, and dypined with both hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the emergency treatment of the defendant, who is the nurseF of the E hospital emergency department, who is an emergency medical worker, by assault and force.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the date, time, and place specified in paragraph 1, and at the same time, and at the same time, reported emergency medical services as above, and received inquiries from H, a police officer belonging to the Seosung-dong Police Station G District of the Seosung-dong Police Station, about personal information on around 09:20 on the same day, and when the above police officer was asked about his/her personal information on the same day, he/she stated that he/she “Goodly defect” was “at least two times.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the police officer H during the on-site investigation according to the 112 Report and obstructed the performance of official duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. A statement in F and I;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 60(1)1 and 12 of the Emergency Medical Service Act on the Selection of Punishment (the point of obstructing emergency medical services), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and the choice of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Attraction of a workhouse;

arrow