logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.11.27 2015노1075
상해등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of the grounds for appeal;

A. As to the crime listed in paragraph (1) of the same Article (the injury of February 24, 2013) of the judgment of the court below, the defendant only committed the crime of 15th of the judgment below (the injury of February 24, 2013), and there was only 3 or 4 her son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's 13 son's son's son her son'.

In light of the facts alleged in the above 13 pages, the date and time of the defendant's assertion shall be deemed March 13, 2013, considering that the contents of the statement of reasons for appeal are almost identical to the statement of reasons for appeal submitted by the counsel of the original court on March 24, 2015.

The victim's face by hand is only one kind of fact, and the victim's face is not assaulted by her drinking and her appearance in a vehicle parked in the parking lot stated in the crime of 【Criminal Offense' (the assault of March 5, 2013) and her own arms in the vehicle parked in the parking lot stated in the crime.

B. The victim did not pay the amount of money borrowed from the defendant, and the defendant was accused of the crime of rape and the crime of injury, etc. The victim's statement is distorted even if the disposition of non-guilty charges was issued for the crime of rape.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty on the grounds of the victim's statement is erroneous.

arrow