Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is as follows: (a) the Defendant: (b) took off a victim’s company’s ties and other players passing through the victim’s company around the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, etc., where the victim D works from February 1, 2016 to February 2, 2016, before the company bank located in the village of 49 (Seongdong-dong); and (c) the Defendant took off property exceeding one billion won prior to the neck, and (d) took off property exceeding one billion won of the lue machine, and used the lue human flac with the lue human escape.
The victim's reputation was damaged by openly pointing out false facts by carrying out one person's demonstration, stating the contents of "the least person's son who may know about his/her intention", etc. working at this place.
2. Determination
(a) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 312 (2) of the Criminal Act;
B. On July 18, 2016, after the prosecution of this case, a written agreement that the victim D does not want punishment against the defendant is submitted.
Judgment dismissing Public Prosecution: Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act