logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.05.17 2017나89966
부당이득금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. On October 15:30 on October 10, 2016, a claim for return of unjust enrichment with respect to a traffic accident that occurred at the front of the office of the Eup/Myeon in the early 1241 (see attached Table Meakdo) as the border in the Seocho-si in the early 1241.

2. The instant accident occurred due to the collision between the Defendant’s vehicle (BK5) and the lower part of the lower part of the Defendant’s vehicle (BK5) who was travelling on the surface of Gwangju at the instant private-distance intersection and the lower part of the lower part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle (Aisher vehicle) who was moving on the surface of Gwangju. The Plaintiff’s vehicle was negligent in exercising his duty of care, and thus, caused the instant accident by neglecting its duty of care; the Defendant’s vehicle was also negligent in paying attention to whether there was a vehicle moving on the right side of Gwangju while moving on the right side of the intersection; it is reasonable to view that the instant accident occurred due to the collision between the Plaintiff’s vehicle and the lower part of the vehicle (BK5 vehicle) and the lower part of the vehicle, in light of the purport of the Plaintiff’s negligence, in light of the following: (i) whether there was a vehicle moving on the right side of Gwangju, and (ii) whether there was a vehicle moving on the right side of Gwangju.

3. The plaintiff's appeal is without merit.

arrow