1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is a person who operates an entertainment planning company under the trade name of "C", and the defendant is a critical instructor.

B. On November 13, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into an exclusive contract (hereinafter “instant contract”) with Nonparty D with the content that the term of the contract is five years, and that the exclusive contract deposit is one million won for five years, and that D’s exclusive management right is exercised upon delegation of the exclusive management right (hereinafter “instant contract”).

C. On February 12, 2015, the Plaintiff left four trainees, including D, to the Defendant at a successful bid for the management of their body and body (hereinafter “instant marina”). D.

During the last day of this case, D has raised an objection due to the Defendant’s physical contact, and the Defendant issued a written agreement with D to the effect that it would not raise any objection against the future civil or criminal matters, while he paid D the amount of KRW 5 million to D and paid it as a agreed amount.

[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2, Eul evidence 2, purport of the whole pleadings]

2. Determination:

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion constituted four trainees, including D and D, and was preparing for the debrising with “E”, but D terminated the instant contract with the Plaintiff on the wind that the Defendant committed sexual indecent act against D during the instant marina period.

Accordingly, the plaintiff suffered losses from loss of the total amount of KRW 750,000,000,000, which was expected to be paid for the above bet Group, and claimed compensation to the defendant.

Therefore, since the defendant agreed to pay KRW 100 million to the plaintiff as compensation for damages, the defendant is obligated to pay KRW 100 million to the plaintiff.

B. According to the reasoning of the judgment 1, Gap evidence No. 1 and the whole purport of the pleadings, the defendant's losses suffered by the plaintiff in relation to the termination of a practice contract due to the defendant's unexpected behavior that was prepared by the plaintiff around February 17, 2015.