The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (the imprisonment of eight months) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant led to the confession and reflect of the crime, the deposit of KRW 2.5 million for the victim, and that part of it was appropriated for the subrogated payment of the medical expenses of the victim, and the first offender.

However, even if the defendant and the victim were to have committed the crime of this case in a contingent manner to resisting the dismissal of the defendant, the method of punishment of this case is too harsh, the victim's injury is serious, the victim's damage is serious, the victim's knife away from the place of crime, and the circumstances after committing the crime are not good, and the victim did not receive a letter of suspicion from the injured party even after being faced with the judgment. In addition, there are no changes in circumstances that may consider the punishment, and other various circumstances that form elements of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, including age, environment, sex, family relationship, etc. of the defendant, the punishment already sentenced by the court below was determined by reducing the amount of punishment by reducing the amount of punishment, and it cannot be deemed unfair because it is too large within the scope of the sentencing guidelines. Thus, the defendant's argument of sentencing is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.