beta
Text
1. The Defendants respectively, and each of them is KRW 50,00,000, and KRW 10,000 to Plaintiff B, and KRW 5,00,000 to Plaintiff C, and KRW 5,00,00.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On April 3, 2009, Plaintiff A was a father of Plaintiff B, who was in the third year of middle school as of April 3, 2009, and Plaintiff C reported the marriage with Plaintiff B on December 2, 200, and thereafter fostering Plaintiff A from that time.
Defendant D was students around that time as Defendant E and F’s children, Defendant G’s children, Defendant H and I’s children, Defendant J’s children, Defendant K, L’s children, Defendant N andO’s children (Defendant D was 2, Defendant G, J, and 3 middle schools).
B. On April 3, 2009, at around 16:00 of the Plaintiff’s pro-Japanese P (Death on August 9, 2012), Defendant J transferred the Plaintiff’s mobile phone and cash from the Plaintiff to the Plaintiff’s mobile phone in front of the R convenience store located in Q Q. On the same day, around 19:00 of the same day, Defendant J transferred the Plaintiff to Defendant D, G, M, etc., who was aware of the Plaintiff’s her son’s son’s son, and transferred the Plaintiff’s son’s son’s son, G, and M, who was forced to commit an indecent act by force, and Defendant D, G, and M transferred the Plaintiff’s her chest and gender to the Plaintiff’s her child-care center from around 23:00 on the same day to around 24:5,00 for a period of 19:0 on the following day, Defendant D, 23:10 of the same day, who was raped from around 209.
(hereinafter “instant tort” / [based on recognition] The Plaintiff and Defendant G, H, and I: The absence of dispute between the Plaintiff and Defendant K: Evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including virtual numbers), the purport of the entire pleadings and the remainder of the Defendants: Article 150(1)(i) of the Civil Procedure Act
2. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. According to the facts of the recognition of Defendant D, J, G, and M, at the time of the tort of this case, Defendant D, J, G, and M were capable of changing their liability for the tort of this case in light of their age and academic level. The above Defendants were deemed to have suffered mental pain to the Plaintiffs as the tort of this case. Thus, Plaintiff C is the Plaintiff.