Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

In order to order the provisional payment of an amount equivalent to the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a corporation that carries out projects for group cultivation, group raising, and joint work, and the two and C is a director.

The prosecutor, who is the defendant's employee, stated as E as the defendant's employee, but even according to the facts charged as to Co-Defendant B, there is no fact that E was involved in the facts charged as to Co-Defendant B, who actually performed the act, and

of March 2016:

4. During the first police officer, C introduced D to C upon the request of C, “When there is any reason to see that C is a reason to see, since she sought headal eggs in China,” and C introduced D to C upon request.

4. Around August, 200: (a) imported 56 km seeds of the domestic unexploited head of the Republic of Korea, among the regions where code greens and booms were distributed, without filing a report thereon with the head of the relevant customs office at Incheon port; and (b) imported the unexploited head of 1,700 g in total by 13 times until May 18, 2016, and committed a violation in relation to the Defendant’s duties.

[Defendant 2] The facts charged are denied, but the records reveal that the Defendant transferred KRW 20 million used to purchase the head of the instant head of the title, and in light of the process and progress of the revenue of the head of the instant head of the title, C and Defendant 2, a director of each corporation, who led the head of the instant head of the title, cannot be deemed to have been negligent in giving due attention and supervision concerning the relevant duties to prevent such violation (the witness B stated to the effect that the farming association corporation was completely unaware of customs duties or head of the title import procedures and that there was no instruction or education.

In full view of the above, the Defendant is deemed to have neglected to exercise due care and supervision over the illegal import of C and B, an employee of the corporation, and the gist of the evidence is without merit.

1. The witness B’s legal statement.