A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On February 18, 2016, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the Cheongju District Court Support on Cheongju District Court on February 18, 2016, and the same court on October 20, 2017 received a summary order of KRW 2 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) and was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 2 million.

【Criminal Facts】

1. A person who is engaged in driving service of seeable vehicle B in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and the Road Traffic Act (non-accident after accident);

On June 15, 2019, at around 21:20, the Defendant driven the above vehicle while under the influence of alcohol with 0.193% of alcohol concentration 0.193%, and continued the road front of the 318 Cheongcheon-ro 318 Cheongcheon-ro, Cheongcheon-ro, into the C Apartment-ro.

Since there is a road where the center line of yellow solid lines is installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to pass along the right side of the center line.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was negligent in driving along the center line while driving along the center line, and the victim E (the 52-year-old) who had driven D d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d kn

Ultimately, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim, such as a cage 11 times cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage c

2. The Defendant was driving a seeable vehicle B under the influence of alcohol by 0.193% at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) of this Article.

Accordingly, the defendant is 3 times the prohibition of drinking driving.