The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable in light of the following: (a) the defendant led to the confession of the crime and reflective behavior; (b) the damage was fully recovered; (c) the investigative agency and the court below agreed with the victims; (d) the victim of the victims of the crime; and (e) the defendant tried to prevent recidivism by a mental therapy; (b) if the sentence in this case becomes final and conclusive, the sentence of the previous suspended sentence will be invalidated; and (c) the defendant committed a prison life for not less than five months in the instant case.

2. In light of the fact that the accused committed a second offense even though he had a number of same criminal records, including the previous criminal records, and that the accused committed a second offense during the period of probation (other than this case, the accused committed a second offense during the period of probation, but was punished by a fine). Considering the circumstances asserted by the Defendant on the grounds of appeal, even if considering the circumstances that the Defendant asserts on the grounds of appeal, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit. Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.