Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
around April 24, 2009, the Defendant stated that “E” in the “E” entertainment tavern operated by the victim D in Osan-si, Osan-si, that “the Internet employee recruitment advertisements have been reported, will begin from the day after the day after the day when the payment was made.”
However, even if the defendant receives a prepaid money, he did not intend to work as an employee in an entertainment drinking house.
The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received 3,000,000 won from the bank account in the name of the Defendant under the pretext of advance payment immediately from the victim.
The defendant of "2015 High 1372" did not have an intention or ability to work even if he/she received money as a prepaid payment from the victim H in fact from the "G main points located in the F. 3rd floor in the Gyeonggi-si-si in Gyeonggi-si on June 28, 2011.
Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim that he would be in a great amount of 6,000,000 won in advance.
As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 6,000,000 won from the victim’s agricultural account (I) in the name of the Defendant, and acquired it by fraud.
Around June 12, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would work as an employee from Kju to Kju’s 2-3th day after the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day to the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from June 12, 2012.”
However, the defendant did not actually intend to work at the above establishment.
The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received 10,000,000 won from the victim’s name as the passbook.
On March 15, 2010, the Defendant: (a) in collusion with M on March 15, 2010, found the “PDada” operated by the O of the victim located in Gangseo-si N; and (b) made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would work as an employee from the Pda operated by the victim; (c) the Defendant would change KRW 5,000,000, M to KRW 3,000,000.”
However, fact is an employee from a multi-party perspective.