1. The defendant is based on the trade of November 17, 2001 on the motor vehicles listed in the separate sheet from the plaintiff.

1. On November 17, 2001, the Plaintiff entered into a sales contract with the Defendant on a motor vehicle listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant motor vehicle”) and delivered all documents necessary for the delivery of the instant motor vehicle and the registration for movement of the motor vehicle to the Defendant upon receipt of KRW 2 million from the Defendant is recognized in accordance with the respective descriptions of evidence No. 1 and No. 3 and the purport of the entire pleadings. Thus, the Defendant is obligated to take over the ownership transfer registration procedure for the instant motor vehicle from the Plaintiff on November 17, 2001, except under special circumstances.

2. The defendant's defense was delivered by the plaintiff, but it was a provisional attachment, seizure, etc., and it was not possible to respond to the plaintiff's claim since the plaintiff did not cancel it. However, according to the recent register of automobile concerning the automobile of this case submitted by the plaintiff, it is recognized that all the provisional attachment, seizure, etc. claimed by the defendant were cancelled. Thus, the defendant's above assertion

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition with the assent of all participating Justices.