Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On February 19, 2003, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 1 million for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in Daegu District Court racing support, and a fine of KRW 2.5 million for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in Daegu District Court and its Daegu District Court on April 2, 2005. On June 7, 2006, at the Daegu District Court and its Daegu District Court, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 4 million for the crimes of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and a fine of KRW 4 million for the crimes of violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court and its Daegu District Court and its branch court on February 8, 2007, respectively.

On July 26, 2012, at around 01:04, the Defendant driven a c-wing vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.053% from the 2km section to the front road of the Western cafeteria located in the Yellow-si, Seook-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on detection of a host driver and report on the circumstances of a host driver;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, etc., and application of inquiry reports and investigation reports (verification of the same criminal records) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty for a crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. According to Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the defendant, who has been sentenced to a suspended sentence on several occasions due to drunk driving, has the history of being sentenced to a suspended sentence, the Road Traffic Act has been amended to strengthen the punishment for drunk driving, the number of drinking alcohol in this case has low, the number of drinking alcohol in this case has been divided by his mistake, and other punishment conditions as ordered, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime in this case, and the circumstances after the crime, shall be determined by taking into account all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.