All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On February 29, 2016, the Plaintiff lent KRW 550,000,000 to C (hereinafter “instant loan”).

B. On October 27, 2015, C entered into a mortgage creation agreement with the Defendant on October 27, 2015 with respect to automobiles listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant automobile”); on the same day, C entered into a mortgage creation agreement on KRW 65,000,000 with the Defendant, and completed a mortgage creation registration with the Defendant as D to receive the viewing of gender.

(hereinafter the above mortgage is referred to as the "mortgage 1 of this case").

C As to the instant automobile, on December 16, 2015, the Defendant entered into a mortgage agreement of KRW 20,000,000 with the bond value of KRW 20,000,00 with the Defendant, and on the same day, the establishment of mortgage was registered to the Defendant E in receipt of the sex viewing.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant mortgage”) D.

C As to the instant motor vehicle, on December 21, 2016, the Defendant entered into a mortgage agreement of KRW 15,000,000 with the bond value of KRW 15,00,000, and on the same day, the establishment of mortgage was registered to the Defendant as F for viewing of the Commercial Act.

(hereinafter the above mortgage "the third mortgage of this case" and the "each of the mortgage of this case" of this case 1 to 3). 【No dispute exists, Gap's 1 to 3 and 22, Eul's 2, and Eul's 2, the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. (1) Whether a preserved claim is established or not. (1) The parties’ assertion (1) at the time of entering into a mortgage contract between the Plaintiff 1 and 2, the legal relationship on real estate development projects conducted by C was established at the time of entering into the mortgage contract between the Plaintiff 1 and 2, and there was a high probability that C would purchase real estate in the near future. In fact, C borrowed money from the Plaintiff and purchased real estate around 2016, the Plaintiff’s loan claim against C is the preserved claim.

(2) At the time of concluding the instant mortgage contract, Defendant 1 and 2, the Plaintiff’s instant loan claim against C was not yet established.