Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the head of the office of the D Association's office in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C, and E is the person who continues to demand the right to move into the association after filing a lawsuit related to the right to move into a reconstruction apartment with the Seoul High Court in 2012 to transfer the building owned by E and obtain the right to move into the association.

On December 13:29, 2015, the Defendant assaulted the victim E, who f, the president of the partnership, against whom the victim resisted F, by taking the victim himself/herself at the above office, such as making him/her knife, making him/ her knife the victim, making him/ her knife the victim, and making him/ her knife him/ her knife the victim who attempted to go out.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Written statements (E);

1. Application of the Cze cinematographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the Defendant’s assertion that the illegality of the Defendant’s act would be avoided by a justifiable act that does not violate social rules. However, according to the aforementioned evidence, the Defendant (CCCB video) syves the victim’s attempt to resist the president of the association, and syves the victim’s attempt to leave the office after 112 report syves the victim’s failure to leave the office, and it is recognized that the above act met the legitimacy and supplement of the purpose and means, which is the requirement for the act of a political party.

As it is difficult to see, the above assertion by the defendant cannot be accepted.