logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.11.17 2017고정775
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 1, 2016, the Defendant of defamation: (a) reported the Kakakao Stockholm conversation between the victim D and his employee E, a trader; (b) caused the victim’s employees, and (c) caused the victims’ injury to their employees, and caused the victims’ injury to their employees and fellows; and (d) led the victims to be informed of the victims’ injury to the victims’ injury and injury; and (b) caused the victims to have them lead a normal social life with their surrounding people.

On September 1, 2016, around 09:07, the Defendant, using a portable phone, wanting to report the type of a motor vehicle to the victim D’s workplace and ties, and the victim E’s workplace with the title of “G” as “G,” and to the victim E’s workplace with a view to making it difficult for the Defendant to do so for a time.

B, however, Doz. Doz. is the same as what he knows, whichever is greater;

(E) 그래 그러자, (E) 새벽 네 시에 막 전화와도 가고 맞제, (D) 그건 그냥 니가 급해서 , (E) 성격도 좀 음과 양으로 맞는 거 갖고, 넌 극단적인 음, 난 극단적인 양, 속궁합도 그러 코, 뭐 잘 맞는 게 많아, (D) 마 쟈, 극단적인 음과 양 ㅋㅋ’ 등 피해자들 간의 카카오 톡 대화 내용을 캡 쳐 한 사진을 문자 메시지 형태로 전송하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of victims openly through the information and communication network for the purpose of slandering the victims.

2. On September 1, 2016, the Defendant sent to the victim D (E) a written message using a portable phone to “(E) that, “(E) he/she shall be able to look at another place even if he/she has to do so)” and the same month.

3. At around 16:09, the victim sent the victim’s text message stating, “The victim has become aware of in the upper line of the company’s counterpart litigation, and it is impossible to attend the company both sides or the company, and it has been confirmed that the case had already been held.”

4. 12.

arrow