The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (fine 4,00,000,000, and 40 hours’ order to complete a sexual assault treatment program) is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. The instant crime is an indecent act committed by the Defendant by force against a victim who was going through the stairs in the subway history, and the nature of the crime is poor, and the fact that the Defendant did not reach an agreement with the victim is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant has no record of punishment for the same crime is favorable to the defendant.

In addition, in full view of the arguments and records of the instant case, the lower court’s sentencing appears to have been appropriately determined by taking into account the above normal relationship and the grounds for sentencing alleged by the prosecutor, and there are no special circumstances to the extent that the sentencing is changed ex post facto, so the Prosecutor’s assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.