logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.12.17 2015고정1059
식품위생법위반
Text

Acquittal of the accused shall be acquitted.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who operates a general restaurant, “C,” located in Seo-gu B, Seo-gu, Seoan-gu, and underground 1 to ground level.

A person who intends to engage in food service business shall be equipped with facilities necessary for the business and file a business report with the competent authority, as prescribed by Presidential Decree.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without reporting to the competent authority from July 25, 2015 to July 28, 2015, up to approximately 249.69 square meters, provided 23 tables on steel-frameed concrete buildings with a size of 249.69 square meters, 46 chairs, 10 cooking units, 2 cooking units, 2 cooking units, gas bags, 1 gas bags, 8 employees (4 male, 4 women), with one cooking unit, and 4 employees (16,00 won at a time of contact), and employed them to perform electricity (2,00 won at 16,00 won at 22,00 won at 3 man-mades), and did not report food service business (3 man-made 19,000 won), 19,000 won at 10,000 won at 10,300 won at 40,000 won at 40.

2. According to the records of acquittal, the defendant was issued a summary order of one million won (2015 high-ranking6881) as a result of violating the Food Sanitation Act in the support of the Daejeon District Court on October 14, 2015, and the above summary order became final and conclusive. The criminal facts of the final summary order are the criminal facts of the final and conclusive summary order from around 19:00 on July 25, 2015 to July 29, 2015, at a general restaurant of "C" with the trade name of "S" on the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, and the first floor from around 19:0 on July 29, 2015, to conduct general restaurant business without reporting general restaurants to the competent authorities.

According to the above facts of recognition, the facts charged of this case committed before the issuance of the above summary order and the facts charged of this case are identical or inclusive crimes.

3. Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a final and conclusive judgment.

arrow